Commerce Commission Website - Transpower - Post-Breach Inquiry
   
Site Search
 
HomeThe CommissionMedia CentreThe LegislationPublicationsPublic RegistersFair TradingConsumer CreditBusiness CompetitionIndustry RegulationRegulatory Control AuthoritiesEnquiries & Complaints
Transpower - Post-Breach Inquiry

In December 2005 the Commerce Commission (the Commission) announced its intention to declare control of Transpower’s transmission services for breaches of its regulatory thresholds.  Following this announcement, Transpower indicated its preference to resolve the situation through an administrative settlement.  After consultation and discussion, the Commission published in October 2007 its preliminary decision not to place Transpower’s transmission services under regulatory control.

 

After consultation with interested parties and further dialogue with Transpower, on 13 May 2008  the Commission published its decision to accept a settlement offer provided by Transpower.  The offer is that Transpower’s existing price path threshold be replaced with three alternate thresholds until 30 June 2011, that the quality threshold be retained, and that the price increase announced for April 2006 and subsequent years be reduced.

 

More specifically, the three new thresholds include:

  • a new ‘transmission revenue requirement’ threshold.  This threshold effectively sets the process, principles and limits that Transpower is required to adhere to when setting its annual revenue requirement.  This  threshold incorporates the outcome of the new Transmission Non Part F capital expenditure threshold into the formula for setting Transpower’s annual revenue requirement;
  • a new Transmission (Non-Part F) capital expenditure threshold. This threshold sets the process and constraints by which an annual level of capital expenditure will be approved in advance; and
  • a new System Operator services threshold. The new System Operator services threshold reflects the terms of the existing contract between Transpower and the Electricity Commission (System Operator Service Provider Agreement).

 

The purpose of the three thresholds is to provide clear principles and limits that Transpower is required to adhere to in order to determine its revenue requirements, capital requirements and adherence to the terms of the relevant systems operator services agreement.

 

The settlement represents significant saving to consumers and ensures Transpower has the incentive to undertake the investments necessary to maintain the national grid.

 

The Commerce Amendment Act 2008 preserved the settlement, with the relevant provisions set out  under subpart 9 of Part 4 of the Commerce Act 1986.

 



» Final Decision and Reasons for Not Amending Transpower's Administrative Settlement to Include Instantaneous Reserves Fees as Pass-Through Costs
» Cross Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
» Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
» Invitation for Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
» Invitation for Submissions on 2008/09 Non part F Capital Expenditure Threshold for Transpower - 28 May 2008
» Cross Submissions on Intention to Declare Control of Transpower - 13 March 2006
» Transpower Thresholds Notice 2008
» Final Decision Not to Declare Control
» Cross Submissions on Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - Transpower
» Submissions on Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - Transpower
» Transpower - Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - 5 October 2007
» Intention to Declare Control - Updated Version
» Intention to Declare Control
» Submissions on Intention to Declare Control of Transpower - 27 February 2006


Final Decision and Reasons for Not Amending Transpower's Administrative Settlement to Include Instantaneous Reserves Fees as Pass-Through Costs
Final Decision Paper - Transpower's Instantaneous Reserve  (258 kb .pdf)

Top

Cross Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
Meridian  (38 kb .pdf)
Transpower  (61 kb .pdf)

Top

Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
Aurora Energy  (202 kb .pdf)
Contact Energy  (101 kb .pdf)
MEUG  (22 kb .pdf)
Powerco  (554 kb .pdf)
Transpower  (155 kb .pdf)
Vector  (129 kb .pdf)

Top

Invitation for Submissions on Transpower’s Proposal to Amend its Settlement Offer to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Fees as Pass-Through Costs
Draft Decision Not to Amend Transpower’s Settlement to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Costs as Pass-Through  (113 kb .pdf)
  - Transpower's Application to Treat Instantaneous Reserve Costs as Pass-Through  (64 kb .pdf)

Top

Invitation for Submissions on 2008/09 Non part F Capital Expenditure Threshold for Transpower - 28 May 2008
Invitation for Submissions on Non Part F Capital Expenditure Threshold for Transpower - 28 May 2008  (54 kb .pdf)
  - Strata - Review of Transpower's Capital Expenditure Plans May 2008  (715 kb .pdf)
Transpower Submission  (84 kb .pdf)

Top

Cross Submissions on Intention to Declare Control of Transpower - 13 March 2006
1. Comalco New Zealand Ltd  (58 kb .pdf)
2. Dongwha Patinna NZ Ltd  (35 kb .pdf)
3. Fletcher Buildings Ltd  (26 kb .pdf)
4. MEUG  (72 kb .pdf)
  - Ireland, Wallace & Assoc Ltd  (88 kb .pdf)
5. Mighty River Power  (40 kb .pdf)
6. Norske Skog Tasman  (29 kb .pdf)
7. Pacific Steel Group  (36 kb .pdf)
8. TelstraClear  (55 kb .pdf)
9. Transpower  (146 kb .PDF)
10. Winstone Pulp International  (65 kb .pdf)

Top

Transpower Thresholds Notice 2008
Commerce Act (Transpower Thresholds) Notice 2008  (191 kb .pdf)
DRAFT - Transpower Thresholds Notice 2008  (159 kb .pdf)
  - Transpower - Cover Letter  (33 kb .pdf)
Transpower submission  (172 kb .pdf)

Top

Final Decision Not to Declare Control
Commerce Act (Decision Not to Declare Control: Transpower New Zealand Limited) Notice 2008  (77 kb .pdf)
  1. Transpower Formal Settlement Proposal - 11 April 2008   (157 kb .PDF)
  2. Final Decision Not to Declare Control of Transpower - 13 May 2008  (755 kb .pdf)

Top

Cross Submissions on Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - Transpower
1. Meridian  (31 kb .pdf)
2. MEUG  (41 kb .pdf)
3. Transpower  (67 kb .pdf)

Top

Submissions on Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - Transpower
1. Board of Airline Representatives New Zealand Inc (BARNZ)  (407 kb .pdf)
Contact Energy  (64 kb .pdf)
2. G Copstick & K Brennan  (69 kb .pdf)
3. Meridian Energy  (180 kb .pdf)
4. MEUG   (88 kb .pdf)
  - Ireland Wallace Associates Ltd  (834 kb .pdf)
  - Cameron Partners  (352 kb .pdf)
5. Mighty River Power  (149 kb .pdf)
6. Todd Energy  (801 kb .pdf)
8. Transpower  (183 kb .pdf)
9. Unison  (336 kb .pdf)
10. Vector  (128 kb .pdf)

Top

Transpower - Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - 5 October 2007
1. Transpower - Draft Decision Not to Declare Control - 5 October 2007  (391 kb .pdf)
  - Formal Settlement Proposal (Transpower)  (158 kb .pdf)
  - Explanatory Material to Transpower's Formal Settlement Proposal (Transpower)  (220 kb .pdf)
  - Review of the WACC in Transpower's Formal Settlement Proposal (Associate Professor Martin Lally)  (203 kb .pdf)
  - Review of Transpower's Capital Expenditure Plans (Strata Energy Consulting Limited)  (927 kb .pdf)
  - Desktop Review of Transpower 2006/07 Operating Expenditure Proposal (GHD Limited)   (401 kb .pdf)
  - Transpower Operational Expenditure Provisions (Meyrick and Associates)  (28 kb .pdf)
  - Opinion on Pseudo Asset Approach (PricewaterhouseCoopers)  (206 kb .pdf)
  - Opinion on Alignment of Fixed Asset Registers (Senior Associate Tim Fairhall)  (46 kb .pdf)

Top

Intention to Declare Control - Updated Version
Intention to Declare Control (Public Version) - 16 February 2006  (456 kb .pdf)

Top

Intention to Declare Control
1. Intention to Declare Control (Public Version) - 31 January  (451 kb .pdf)
2. NZIER Analysis of Breaches (Public Version) - 31 January  (165 kb .pdf)
3. NZIER Spreadsheet Analysis of Breaches (Public Version) - 31 January  (69 kb .XLS)
4. NZIER Background Analysis (Public Version) - 8 February   (46 kb .XLS)

Top

Submissions on Intention to Declare Control of Transpower - 27 February 2006
1. Business New Zealand  (31 kb .pdf)
2. Carter Holt Harvey  (20 kb .pdf)
3. Comalco NZ Ltd  (48 kb .pdf)
4. Dongwha Patinna NZ Ltd  (32 kb .pdf)
6. Electricity Networks Assoc  (48 kb .pdf)
7. Fletcher Building Ltd  (19 kb .pdf)
5. M Fouhy  (35 kb .pdf)
8. Meridian  (34 kb .pdf)
9. MEUG  (32 kb .pdf)
10. Mighty River Power  (121 kb .pdf)
11. Norske Skog  (24 kb .pdf)
12. Pacific Steel  (20 kb .pdf)
13. Pan Pac Forest Industries  (22 kb .pdf)
14. Powerco  (142 kb .pdf)
15. Todd Energy  (263 kb .pdf)
16. Transpower Submission - Intention to Declare Control  (808 kb .pdf)
  - Peter Bradford  (99 kb .pdf)
  - CRA International  (353 kb .PDF)
  - Castalia  (131 kb .pdf)
  - FNZC  (123 kb .pdf)
  - Lexecon - Gustavo Bamberger  (89 kb .pdf)
  - NERA  (204 kb .pdf)
  - PwC - EV Regime  (259 kb .pdf)
  - PwC - Compliance Statements  (227 kb .PDF)
17. Unison  (649 kb .pdf)
18. Vector  (243 kb .pdf)
19. P Ward  (29 kb .pdf)
20. Waitaki Power Trust  (32 kb .pdf)
21. Winstone Pulp International  (59 kb .pdf)

Top

Download Acrobat Reader Print
Top